Shabbat shalom chaverim and welcome to a message that I had not at all planned but which came to me forcefully a few days ago. It is such an urgent one that I now understand why I was moved upon so powerfully to commit it both in writing as well as record a video of it. Though I know many, if not most, of you will find this shocking at first but please be patient with me. I can truthfully say it has set me free from a measure of guilt which was never mine to bear. It took me 40 years to realise finally the truth I want to share with you. I hope it will set many of you free too.

Today we call them 'Karens'. What's a 'Karen'? A Karen is the prejorative slang term typically used to refer to an American middle class white woman who is perceived as entitled or excessively demanding. You've no doubt seen memes or short video clips of 'Karens' and their obnoxious behaviour. They can be rude, aggressive and at times violent. But 'Karens', though today very much 'in your face', are nothing new. They have been called 'Miss Ann's', 'Becky's' and many other names in the past, but thanks to the internet we have become much more aware of them...and more numerous. As obnoxious female behaviours have manifested more and more in the anti-male culture of the 21st century Western world, so this unseemly female behaviour has become more and more visible...and shocked everyone.

Now I could single out and talk about 'Karens' in particular but my goal today is much broader than that narrow category of carnal female. We must start with men to get some context. The demonisation of the male gender arguably began in the 18th century with the advent of the Enlightenment at the end of the 17th century. This is the time when men started to be confronted with the ugly, nasty and brutal side of their own carnal, fleshy, Adamic, fallen nature. Ungodly women largely escaped the deserved judgment given to ungodly men for over two centuries and were, at least in my own native British culture, the exalted gender. They were raised up, enthroned and worshipped by being put on pedistals as the fairer sex.

The English poet Robert Southey (1774-1843) did a great disservice to all of us in writing what one must suppose was intended to be a light-hearted rhyme that children started learning and taking seriously from a young age. Both genders started believing this assessment of themselves:

"What are little boys made of?
What are little boys made of?
Snips and snails
And puppy-dogs' snails
That's what little boys are made of.

"What are little girls made of?
What are little girls made of?
Sugar and spice
And all things nice
That's what little girls made of

The thing is, children believed this nonsense and accepted it as the wisdom of sage adults. I know I did. We never thought to question it. How were we to know any better? So depending which version of the rhyme you learned, boys were compared with snips (or leftovers), snails, frogs, snakes or slugs and we came to believe that girls were so much better and purer than we were, like sugar and spice and everything nice. No wonder we worshipped them, putting them up in the heavenlies. Girls were fairer and, well, boys weren't. Boys were coarse and vulgar. Girls were at the apex and boys...well, second-class odds and ends at best. We were of two entirely different and eternally separate natures and never the twain would meet.

Now I don't want to get into the dark side of the male today - as a society we've been through all that so many times. The rise of feminism did, at least as one of its results, force us to confront the nastier side of the carnal man, but without confronting the parallel negatives about the female psyche. Why? Because, well, there weren't any. The result was to not only gradually overturn the obnoxious side of male patriarchy but to ruthlessly overturn all patriarchy, and sidestep putting the obnoxious side of the female psyche under the microscope. This has created what today we call postmodernism that has led to the post-Christian, Marxist-controlled 'woke' culture. Not until this year (2025), following a dramatic political and cultural shift in the USA which has yet to fully impact us here in Europe and other Western nations, are we seeing pushback against this false Marxist-feminist narrative. People have had enough of the indiscriminate demonistion of men and the absurd near deification of women along with all their by now very visible defects. For it turns out (no big surprise to Bible-believing Christians) that men aren't all sour and women aren't all sweet. Both genders are a 'mixed bag' as we would expect.

There is a galactic difference between the redeemed and unredeemed male and female natures, respectively, that comes from being fully and authentically surrendered to, and born again, in Christ. The male and female natures of the saved and the unsaved might as well be two entirely different species. Unfortunately most Christians, male and female, who think they're saved, aren't. The Messianic Community (Church) is awash with snips. Most believers, so-called, aren't saved - aren't fully regenerated. We think we are when we aren't. This state of affairs exists for a variety of reasons, but one of them, importantly (which we ignore at our peril) is the the enornmous osmotic influence of our now utterly fallen and corrupt ex-Christian Western culture on Christian communities. The dysfunctional culture has not only seeped into our theology but in many cases completely taken it over lock, stock and barrel, and progressively expelled the Ruach haQodesh (Holy Spirit). We have been tricked into admitting a clever counterfeit that inverts and then mixes up the genders into a pot pourri of chaos.

The men have become 'feminised' (and emasculated) and the women have become 'masculinised' (and defeminised). Both have been deluded into believing there are suddenly hundreds of genders where before only two had previously been known for millennia. We knew, of course, that there was a spectrum of masculinity and femininity (some men being more feminine than others and some girls being Tom-boys though these were often developmental stages and were 'grown out of' during maturity) but we always knew where the line of separation was thanks to scientific discoveries in the field of genetics and the visible secondary sex or physical characteristics such as the breats of female mammals or the breeding plumage of male birds that appear in members of one sex at puberty. These primary and secondary characteristics bore witness to each other. And though there were occasional mutations (such as men with breasts) we had, and still have, genetic explanations for these abnormalities. Science has otherwise confirmed what the Bible has known all along. There are two genders with a set of sex chomosomes to prove it - 'XY' in men and 'XX' in women.

With zero scientific evidence and zero endorsement of the Bible, people are suddenly claiming there are hundreds of genders. To establish this claim not only science and the Bible are rejected but logic and rational thinking too. Feelings have replaced reason and society has begun to atomise and break apart because we cannot properly communicate with each other anymore. This means there is no longer any accountability. This means that there is no longer a consensus to hold society together any more. In a word, postmodernism has become a license for lawlessness with society itself splitting, as it were, into thousands of 'denominations'. What we're seeing is a kind of secular 'protestantism'. And this is what happens when people protest too much, when individualism and collective responsibility get out of balance.

To use as an analogy the seven annual festivals, it's as though the summer and autumn (fall) festivals that bear witness of the importance of the Christian collective are thrown out leaving only the spring ones that are all about our individual relationship with Elohim (God). And this is the thing: Yahweh has created humans to be both individuals and a collective in an apparent ratio of 3-to-4...3 parts individual and 4 parts social, and perhaps even 3 parts passion and 4 parts reason. Aparently - and this now seems to be the lesson of history - when we get these out of balance, dysfuntionality sets in and humans start falling apart psychologically and spiritually, individually and societally. We have seen this happen spectacularly in the 20th century in particular with the rise of mass social movements like communism and fascism that emphasise the collective, and liberalism that emphasises the individual, with the Soviet Union and United States representing these extremes. The Soviet system collapsed in 1990/1 and the American system is collapsing today in 2025. We weren't designed for either of these. Clearly individual freedom and collective responsibility have to be married somewhow but all human attempts to do so have so far failed. And continuing to ignore the biblical way will simply result in yet another social disaster which we know is coming because rebellious man simply refuses to do things Yahweh's Way

The madness of agenderism, cisgenderism, genderqueerism, bigenderism, genderfluidity, transgenderism, nonbinaryism, intersexism and all the other man-made -ism's will eventually pass away into the trashcan of history but not without leaving more chaos and uncertainty in their wake. The Marxist attempt to push these to replace their failed revolutionary model will be discredited fully but without repentance all that remains left for defiant humans to try is open satanism, the final Antichrist system. And he will. The damage has been done by all the social experiments of the last 300 years and it will take the return of Christ to clean it all up. Meanwhile stupidity will continue its willful, prideful march over the precipice of experimentation (with everything except the biblical way) and into the abyss. It will be up to biblically-minded, divine tavnith-oriented and Torah-obedient Christians and Messianics like ourselves to keep warning people and to set the example for how society is supposed to be, and will be, in the Millennium. So we need to know what true men and women are supposed to look like and be them. We we need to know who we actually are and to discern the counterfeits.

We therefore need to be fully informed as to the truth of gender and what our divinely-assigned gender rôles are. Before we worry about politics and how society is supposed to be run we need to clearly know what male and female rôles are, repent of the false notions we have foolishly embraced, and return to order, beauty and sanity:

"So Elohim (God) created man in His own image,
in the image of Elohim (God) He created him;
male and female He created them" (Gen.1:27, NIV).

Until we recognise and submit to that self-evident revelation and truth, we're going nowhere as societies and nations, because these newly invented, twisted pseudo-gender claimants not only hate and despise each other but are now at collective war with the actual genders. Instead of being complimentary they are exclusive because they're not what they were created to be. They claim to be 'inclusive' and yet exclude the naked truth. They represent the ultimate in egotism and narcissism and rebellion against Elohim (God).

For many years I have been exposing several of these counterfeit spirits. On the female side, I have alerted believers to several demonic spirits whose sole purpose has been to destroy our God-given genders and the respective rôles assigned to them by the Creator for our mutual happiness and prosperity. I was initially unaware of them, first encountering them as a deliverance minister. As most who came to me for help were women I came to know these female counterfeits extremely well. They go by names like 'Hecate', 'Lilith' and 'Jezebel' who (aside from Jezebel) are little known to Christians caught up in the gender deceptions, but are revered by Wiccans, Satanists and occult-minded liberal 'Christians'. Because they have so deeply penetrated our 'progressive' (in reality, regressive) cultures, most are totally unaware of them and assume that as far as the genders are concerned (which are now regarded by so many as 'fluid') we have been supposedly 'evolving' into something bordering on, if not in actuality, 'unisexuality' - the erosion of gender distinctions altogether - something that occultists passionately believe in and which started getting underway in the 1960's.

One thing I discovered in administering to exiting satanists is that they fanatically believe in the androgenous character called Tintomara whose legend was made into a movie in 1970 that was marketed as newly invented fiction. It wasn't. I know this because of a women who was born and raised in devil-worship, a high level witch who came to me desperate for help whom the satanic coven named 'Tintomara'. You can read her story and poems on our Deliverance website. Through victims such as this woman I have encountered evil which 99.99 per cent of people - and that's nearly all Christians too - do not even know exists and who consider you to be a conspiracy nutcase if you so much as mention it. You won't find much about 'Tintomara' online beyond the actual movie - the few websites that do are flagged as 'unsafe' by various internet browsers, much as ours has started to be in recent years for similar reasons, a reason we distribute it offline to genuine seekers to make sure this message is preserved and disseminated.

I mention this only to inform the reader that I have learned much of the agenda of occultists as far as gender is concerned. They (read 'Satan') put a high value on 'deconstructing the genders' which is why we now have so much gender dysphoria in the world. Indeed, this trend has become so obnoxious to the sensible human mind that even the homosexual and bisexual (LGB) communities are pulling back from supporting the 'TQIA+' part of what has come to be euphemistically called 'LGBTQIA+' with its complicated flag of many colours and ever evolving name, for even they can see that something is very wrong. But again, this is not the topic of this discussion, and I bring this up only to give some kind of context to my main topic, which is the features of the fallen, carnal or Adamaic nature in women.

What I am about to share with you is what the Swiss psychiatrist and psychoanalyst Carl Gustav Jung (1875-1961) discovered but could not publish because of the direction the powers-that-be were taking Western culture. His findings would have been a major spanner-in-the-works for the feminist, liberal and Marxist movements. Jung was a contemporary of another famous Austrian psychiatrist and psychoanalyst, Sigmund Freud (1856-1939) who had a profound influence on Western culture that accelerated after the disillusionment that set in after the disaster of the First World War. Freud persuaded a credulous and indulgent people reacting against the failure of the churches to oppose the Great War that sexuality lay at the root of everything. Freud played a major part 'legitimising' the sexual revolution. Unlike Jung (who had a Christian background), Freud was from a kabbalistic Jewish one and he was, to all intents and purposes, an atheist.

I was tutored in Freudianism by a clinical psychologist friend of mine during his doctorate research days at Oxford University (Dr. Gregory Young) where I had myself graduated in Biochemistry, and by an eccentric retired psychotherapist called Dr.Rolf Kosterlitz (1906-1989), a graduate of New College during the war, who lived in retirement on the Banbury Road like myself (as also did a famous evolutionary scientist who was my neighbour, Desmond Morris, author of The Naked Ape, whom I mention because he, like Jung, was an evolutionist as most scientists in the 20th century were). Kosterlitz was a fascinating secular German Jew, whom I befriended because of our mutual interest in Asian culture, and had an equally fascinating personal history. You meet all kinds of amazing people in Oxford. Kosterlitz escaped the nazi terror just in time and was rumoured to have been part of an Israeli terrorist group in its early days. He was terrified of being assassinated and died under mysterious circumstances, I am told, when a hit-and-run driver killed him on an Oxford street. This was a year after I left Oxford and England to go and live in Norway.

I met Rolf at a tea party hosted by the Oxford Japanese Society. He was a short, little man with a receeding hairline, with round glasses that reminded me a bit of the communist revolutionary Leon Trotsky, a Jew like himself. He had a fabulous old art collection that crowded the walls of his tiny flat that I believe was quite valuable. I would occasionally take tea with him, usually accompanied by others who were ad equally keen as I was to tap his brilliant mind. He would school us in his knowledge of psychology while we sipped chai and nibbled biscuits and cakes. He struggled valiantly to explain Gestalt psychology, as this did not come easily to one like myself schooled in reductionism - nevertheless I was persuaded eventually of the importance that Gestalt Theory taught of never losing sight of what I would later, further tutored by N.T.Wright, come to call the 'big picture'. Hence I have always encouraged people not to get lost in the details of theology but focus on the main storyline. The Story is everything). Anyway, Freud's revolutionary beliefs (and dubious science, in my opinion) made his ideas about human psychology and Charles Darwin's evolutionary theory, especially popular with the communists (and socialists in general) whose goal was, and still is (today through a gradual invasion of the Institutions rather than through violent revolution) the overthrow of Christian civilisation. And though one must tread carefully with Jung too because of his interest in esoterica, he was at least more objective and his research work therefore merits careful study.

Thanks to Jung, we today commonly speak or 'archetypes'. These may be said to be innate patterns of thought and behaviour that strive for realisation within an individual's environment. It is, he taught, present in the collective unconscious of all human beings. The way we respond to these determines the development of our identity. Examples of archetypes would include the 'mother', the 'father', the 'child', the 'deceiver' and the 'flood'. All of these are clearly recognisable from Scripture. Unlike modern atheistic evolutionary psychology which subscribes to the tabula rasa theory of human development (which suggests we are all born with a 'blank slate' and that our experiences shape our thoughts, behaviours and feelings) Jung believed that there are universal experiences such as 'belongingness', 'love', 'death', 'love' and 'fear'. These experiences, which he called the 'collective unconscious', are expressed in what he called 'archetypes' If you have ever listened to Jordan B. Peterson, who is famous in our day, you will notice he uses a lot of Jungian terminology. And whilst Jung believed that these archetypes were influenced by what he, as a Darwinist, called 'evolutionary pressures', Peterson would see a different set of causes that involve Elohim (God). That is the tack I shall be taking too.

The Prologue to the Gospel of John tells us that every single human being entering this world at conception and birth possesses what he symbolically calls 'light' - the Light of Christ which is the basis of every individual's conscience, an internal radar, if you like, enabling us to distinguish between basic moral truth and falsehood:

"There was a man sent from Elohim (God), whose name was John [the Baptist]. This man came for a witness, to bear witness of the Light, that all through him might believe. He was not that Light, but was sent to bear witness of that Light. That was the true Light which gives light to every man coming into the world" (Jn.1:6-9, NKJV).

• a. these archetypes are transmitted genetically (presumably in DNA) - which was the belief of the Swedish biologist Lamarck; or are
• b. acquired from scratch by observation and imitation from parents and society.

The second, atheistic explanation is what is meant by tabula rasa or 'blank slate' or 'blank sheet of paper'. This is what our secular politicians believe too which is why they hate homeschooling so passionately because they want the state to program our children to become easily controllable puppets of the system. It's from this notion that postmodernism justifies the idea that gender isn't something we're born with but is learned, and they want to direct that controlled learning - they don't want parents or religion involved in shaping the child. That's one of the reasons they want mothers in the work place and their toddlers in Kindergartens so the collective or 'village', likewise pre-programmed, can write the official narrative on the tabula rasa.

Now it's a little more complicated than that but we only have time to hone in on one or two facets of the equation. Tabula rasa is only a half-truth. In reality we come with inbuilt psychological tools - the archetypes we receive at conception when the Light of Christ joins with our flesh and spirit to make us humans - enabling us, as we get older, to react to anything that is false. But before about the age of 8 our discernment is poor which is why the state wants our children when they're very small. Mothers and fathers are given the divine task to align their children with that inner Light which serves as a beacon or moral compass until they are old enough to choose Christ and receive the Ruach haQodesh (Holy Spirit) to lead them further as adults into all truth (Jn.16:13). That is why individual home nurturing is so important at that age. And that is what the big battle is all about because behind all the political machinations are other, invisible forces. That is why Satan has built the system the way it is and given with its current philosophical and political underpinning. That's why he hates homseschooling so passionately and why it is so important in the early years of a child's development.

Truth is not personal and individual - it is universal, spiritual and therefore cosmic, if you like, because Yah'shua the Messiah (Jesus Christ), the Creator of us human beings, is the very definition of truth. Moreover, we're born with that truth in us which we can never run away from, only deny and suppress through the free agency which Yahweh has also given us. We're free to choose. This 'suppression' or 'defilement of conscience' Freud tried to explain sexually. And Jung, in his own way, was influenced by a mixture of Calvinistic Christianity and occultism - his father was a Swiss Reformed pastor. So his ideas are a 'mixture' and we must tease them apart if we are to make him useful. One thing is for certain and it's that Jung was closer to the truth than Freud. The problems lay in their peculiar mixtures of Darwinism and mysticism because Freud too was inflenced by Jewish mysticism or kabbalism as I suspect one of my mentors, the aforementioned and late Rolf Kosterlitz, was too. There are universal archetypes, if that's what we want to still call them, as Jordan Peterson does, but they are not the accumulated experiences acquired from 'evolution' that are passed to their offspring by parents viâ DNA, an idea you will be familiar with if you are a Goerge Lucas Star Wars fan where is is called 'The Force' - this is supposedly the collective conscience of both the living and the dead and not unlike the Buddhist idea of Nirvana. As Christians we believe these archetypes come directly from heaven. Becoming human is automatic provided we don't suppress our consciences.

Now that I have set the stage - and I apologise if it seems a little complicated but we do need to know how others think and what they believe - let's take a look at what Jung discovered about women that he was allegedly too afraid to publish while he was alive which I hope will demystify the carnal female nature as much for women as for men because some of the female 'virues' we assume to be virtues turn out to be anything but virtuous, but rather the product of something very dark and sinister indeed which we are going to trace right the way back to the beginning of man and woman. (And in case you wrongly think I am mysogenous and picking on women, please know (and you will if you are familiar with my teachings these past 40 years) that I am not. Please also know that men have their own dark side that is often viewed positively by believers and unbelievers alike). We both have evil natures in our unredeemed state but they are shaped a little differently because of gender differences.

So let me begin by making a statement made by Carl Jung which may shock and even repell you, but bear with me if you would:

"No tree can grow to heaven unless its roots reach down to hell. And no woman becomes whole until she faces the shadow she's hidden from you" (Carl Jung) [1].

What I am going to say now will shock you but please bear with me patiently. We have been lied too, not just by society, not just by love songs and romantic comedies, not just by Black Metal, norse mythology and paganism in general, but by our own defiled consciences because of the relentless indoctrination and brainwashing we have been subjected to since the day we were born. It is hard - really hard - navigating this world because there are so many layers of lies packed one on top of the other in the sphere of human knowledge. Some of us are called to deconstruct it and get to hidden core truths. Here's the problem - and please don't turn off after you have heard me say this: we were raised to believe that all women in their natural state - the way they are born - are gentle, nurturing and selfless. We have been told that their love is pure, their intentions noble, their hearts uncorrupted by the darker impulses that haunt the male gender. This thesis, in various wordings and constructions, is what underlies feminist claims, and is why they believe matriarchy must replace patriarchy as quickly as posible, through progressive government legislation, classroom indoctrination and corporate training in the workplace.

But Jung, who painstakingly mapped the darkest corners of the human psyche, discovered something far more unsettling. Beneath the surface of every woman, he claimed, lies a force so primal, so ruthlessly calculating, that most men never see it until it's too late because of the way is it craftily packaged and acted out in carnal or natural behaviour. By the time we have finished today you will see things, I hope, about the carnal female that we mistake to be spiritual, something you will absolutely not be taught by politically correct and feminism-steered psychotherpists or reinforced in the education system as a whole. Once you have understood the truth about human nature in this sphere, you will be able to accurately predict carnal female behaviour, protect yourself from emotional warfare, and regain the power, strength and clarity of vision - even as a believer - that you lost to a game you never knew you were playing. It's a lesson that's taken me all my life to learn which I hope you can learn a lot sooner than I did. The sisters need to understand this every bit as much as the brethren. This is as important to the ladies as much as it is to the men because the fleshy nature is always trying to get into the mainstream feeds of our minds and hearts, as we know all too well. That's why Paul uses such brutal language in his instructions to us on how to handle it - we are to CRUCIFY IT, not just gently deflect it to one side, because, being steered by demons (as the fallen nature is) it is persistent.

If you choose to be an overcomer, as you are called to be, you know this to be true. To remind you, then, let me give you some quotations from the Book of Revelation which those of you who did the course should be very familiar with:

"To him who overcomes, I will give the right to eat from the tree of life, which is in the paradise of Elohim (God)" (Rev.2:7, NIV).

"He who overcomes will not be hurt at all by the second death" (Rev.2:11, NIV).

"He who overcomes will, like [those who have not soiled their clothes], be dressed in white. I will never blot out his name from the book of life, but will acknowledge his name before My Father and His malakim (angels)" (Rev.3:5, NIV).

"Him who overcomes I will make a pillar in the temple of My Elohim (God). Never again will he leave it. I will write on him the Name of My God (Elohim) (Yahweh) and the name of the city of My Elohim (God), the New Jerusalem (Eden-Astara), which is coming down out of heaven [at the start of the Millennium] from My Elohim (God); and I will also write on him My New Name" (Rev.3:12, NIV).

"To him who overcomes, I will give the right to sit with Me on My throne, just as I overcame and sat down with My Father on His throne" (Rev.3:21, NIV).

"I am the Alef (Alpha) and the Taw (Omega), the Beginning and the End. To him who is thirsty I will give to drink without cost from the spring of the mayim chayim (water of life). He who overcomes will inherit all this, and I will be his Elohim (God) and he will be My son. But the cowardly, the unbelieving, the vile, the murderers, the sexually immoral, those who practice magic arts, the idolaters and all liars - their place will be in the fiery lake of burning sulphur. This is the second death" (Rev.21:6-8, NIV).

Brethren and sisters, these forces that must be overcome through our faith are dangerous. This is why we must struggle so hard at times not to succumb to them until Christ is given full access to every part of us so He can do the actual overcoming or conquering of the demonic powers for us...which He did, on the cross, which is why we must ever go to it and seek His grace. But first we must choose. First we must take the bull by the horns and then call upon Yah'shua (Jesus) to take the lead. And He will.

What I am saying, and am about to say, isn't mysogeny - true men adore their women, and true women adore their men - what this is all about is raw, naked survival. That much Jung understood. Those of you who know my writings and have heard my sermons know that I have the profoundest respect, admiration and love for women who are walking in the Ruach (Spirit). They are angels. They are inspirational. They are wonderful and worthy of honour. I often praise them. Indeed I have been told by several sisters that I positively celebrate the female - and it's true, I absolutely do, because I know what they can become. But I give no woman carte blanche even if she claims to be a Christian or a Messianic because I have seen far too many devils wearing gospel skirts - who wear the label but do not possess the substance - who have caused me no small amount of grief throughout my life. Yes, I have been fooled, more often than I care to admit. And godly women have likewise been fooled by ungodly men.

So the exact same is true of devilish men which we know all about because men are less subtle about their darkness than women (the Karens excepted). Men and women in their fallen condition can be, and often are, monsters worthy of any horror movie. What today's message is about is how to distinguish between the carnal and the spiritual female. I am out to expose the carnal female today, as I have the carnal male in the past, to save both spiritual men and women from being hurt and even destroyed. So, I repeat, this is not a mysogenous rant. I am not here to knock women. Please understand that. This is simply an exposé of a giant lie, and lies are no respecters of persons or their genders.

I want to talk to the men first primarily because in our ignorance we are the primary victims but I want the women to follow along too. You men, think back and answer me this question: have you ever met a woman whom you thought was perfect, kind, devoted and achingly vulnerable, only to watch her transform into someone cold, indifferent, even cruel when you needed her most? That, according to Jung, wasn't a coincidence. That wasn't 'just how people are'. That was what Jung called a woman's 'shadow' at work, what as Christians we, and Paul, would call the 'flesh' - the fallen, carnal, devilish Adamic/Evic nature. When you see this behaviour, you are seeing what an unregenerated woman spends a lifetime disguising, even from herself. She's blind to it, as we men are to our counterparts, and must be helped to see. Of course, only the Ruach haQodesh (Holy Spirit) can do the meaningful exposing so that repentance and overcoming can follow; my message - and that of other teachers and preachers - is stimply to alert you to a problem. Thereafter it's up to you.

You men know, I think, what I am talking about, and you spiritual women here will hopefully recognise it as having belonged to your former pre-crucified self in Christ. Both of you see it in the carnal women all around you, and not just the aggressive, Hecatic 'Karens'. This is what one might call the emotional 'whiplash' you men get from an encounter with a carnal woman who adored you one day and then discarded you, or dumped you, the next. If you have known such a woman - particularly a wife or ex-wife, or a girlfriend or ex-girlfriend - the way she rewrote history, painting you as the villain for sins you never committed. I knew a woman who, shortly before she left her husband, re-wrote all her journals, altering the original story of her married life, changing the truth into a lie to justify her filing for divorce. She also took out all the photographs of her husband from her photograph albums that showed his devotion to her and their children. You see, the tears seemed genuine in the monment, but in hindsight were just another move in a game you, the man, didn't know you were playing. In another word, you were being 'played'.

Jung was a clever man and saw this behaviour pattern a century ago. In his private notes he wrote:

"The feminine persona is a masterpiece of deception, not because women are liars, but because nature demands it."

By 'nature' he meant something slightly different to us for as Christians we make a clear distinction betweem the fallen flesh and the redeemed spirit. And whilst he saw this tendency to deceive as part of women's 'design', the truth is women were not 'designed' to deceive because the Creator does not deceive, and women, like men, were originally made in the Creator's image. But we lost that image through sinning and rebellion, and acquired a demonic nature. So to be more accurate, the 'design' has been distorted by the Fall and therefore by the satanic nature which resides in our fleshy nature. It's there and it's all messed up. What we are seeing is the personality of the Serpent at work when such deception is perpetrated - in this example by fallen women on men. And by the way, Jung also saw the parallel nature in men to ruthlessly 'conquer', because we need to clarify that is the tendency of wicked men to subjugate and enslave women by violence, a perversion of the original design of Yahweh for men who were created to expect righteous submission and obedience from their wives, as Paul so taught:

"Wives, submit to your own husbands, as to the master (Lord). For the husband is head of the wife, as also Christ is head of the messianic community (church); and He is the Saviour of the Body. Therefore, just as the Body (church) is subject to Christ, so let the wives [subject] be to their own husbands in everything" (Eph.5:22-24, NKJV; cp. 1 Pet.3:1).

Our modern liberalised churches, leavened by feminism and by a whole swathe of marxist ideas as they are, whilst denying that the basic female nature is flawed, nevertheless expect husbands to fulfil their part of the marriage relationship instructions recorded in the six detailed verses that follow. This is what Paul went on to say to the Ephesians after instructing the wives:

"Husbands, love your wives, just as Christ also loved the messianic community (church) and gave Himself for her, that He might sanctify and cleanse her with the washing of water by the word, that He might present her to Himself a glorious Body (church), not having spot or wrinkle or any such thing, but that she should be qadosh (holy) and without blemish. So husbands ought to love their own wives as their own bodies; he who loves his wife loves himself. For no one ever hated his own flesh, but nourishes and cherishes it, just as the Master (Lord) does the messianic community (church)" (Eph.5:25-30, NKJV).

You'll notice amongst Christian feminists that the shorter section addressed to wives (verses 22-24) is rejected but this longer section addressed to husbands is enforced! Women, they say, don't have to submit to the 'wicked patriarchy' but, by golly, the men had better adore and love the women anyway! And though feminism began as a demand for 'equality' and coheadship in its first two waves, it soon degenerated into an aggressive demand for male submission to women (matriarchy or female-rulership) in its 'third wave', revealing what actually underpinned it in the first place: Jung's female shadow.

Jung observed that while men evolve to conquer and to fight, women evolve to survive. Seen from a fleshy point-of-view, this makes perfect sense. Therefore, Jung argued, survival for women has always depended on their ability to navigate male psychology. And that is why a carnal woman's love is never unconditional...and can't be. It becomes, in such a situation, a transaction, a negociation, a biological contract where the husband's or boyfriend's utility or usefulness to her determines his worth in her eyes. Jung called this the 'anima trap', the male tendency to project his own longing onto a woman, mistaking her performance of vulnerability to be depth of character. And that's where the horror sets in, because the woman the man loved (if he was a spiritual man, that is, and she a carnal woman in this scenario) wasn't being real. She was a mirror, reflecting back whatever version of herself would keep the man invested. When the man was strong, she was devoted. When he showed weakness, she recoiled. When he failed to meet her unconscious demands, she punished him for not reading her mind - not with anger but with withdrawal, with indifference, with the silent Lilithic treatment that left him begging for scraps of the affection she once lavished on him.

Have you noticed that carnal women expect their husbands to be psychic - to know what they're thinking? Comedians have a field day with this behaviour but, you know, it's not really very funny, is it? It's not what we want at all. And you'll have noticed, I'm sure, how men are portrayed as complete idiots in comedy and the movies these days and their wives s being a lot smarter and maturer. Well, that's what happens when divinely-appointed rôles are reversed - men do become shallow idiots only now they are in revolt in the West which is why the whole dating scene is collapsing in the USA. We are seeing the fruits of feminism coming to a full ripening and what we see is not good. Men and women are driving each other apart...or going along with the occult agenda and homogenising the genders into a some undefinable, ugly grey hermaophrodite, unisexual goo.

I speak from considerable experience both from my own life and from the lives of those I have counselled as a pastor, which is why I have written so much on this subject, for both dysfunctional spiritual man/carnal woman and carnal man/spiritual woman relationships. But what I have said so far is just scratching the surface. There's more - lots more - and I'm hoping many of you are recognising some of the things I have said as part of your own experience. But bear with me, for what comes next is even darker but contains the key for getting out of this mess. Because Jung not only uncovered the purpose behind this unseemly and ungodly behaviour. Once men have understood why women do this - the real, deeper reason - you'll never look at worldly 'love' the same way again.

There is a reason we are commanded to marry believers and not unbelievers (2 Cor.6:14) and I am sure you know most of the reasons. But we're not simply commanded to select husbands and wives who believe but those who also do and who just aren't just acting out their religion: unless the believing spouse is authentically born again or spiritually regenerated and transformed by the Ruach haQodesh (Holy Spirit) that acts to lead you to choose to crucify the carnal man or woman, then you're going to get a lot of carnal behaviour from your 'Christian' husband or wife that matches that of the carnal unbeliever that I have been describing. It's not enough to just call yourself a believer and act out the rôle - that called 'nominal' or 'symbolic Christianity' - you've actually got to become a believer - a wholly new man or woman - or you'll be in for marital disappointment, frustration and quite likely experience separation and divorce and divorce at some point. Some of you know what I am talking about and can testify to the truth of what I am saying.

But let's go on. Let me ask you men a rhetorical question that will cut deeper than you expect. Have you ever been truly loved for who you are? Or have you only been valued for what you provide - your skills, your resources (like money, her coveted 'nest egg'...these women are called 'gold-diggers' today), your ability to shield your wife from life's harshest truths? A chilling pattern emerges the deeper you follow this rabbit trail, and it's this: carnal women do not love in the biblical or any sense, they negociate pacts with the flesh. Think back a minute. The moment you lost your job, did she stay, or did her respect for you fade? When you showed emotional vulnerability, did she cherish it or did she subtly pull away in contempt for your being 'weak'?

Now listen hard and don't misinterpret me because I want to be charitable and not react from the gut but from a redeemed heart. This behaviour I have described isn't necessarily cruelty (unless she's a calculatingly evil person) but usually instinctual. Whenever a woman prioretises survival over sentiment (because, for instance, she has been in a previously abusive relationship), she outlives those other survivors who didn't make that priority, and that 'survival of the fittest' truth still governs unregenerated female attraction today. They see all the people in the mental institutions and don't want to end up there. Chances are if you have known more than one carnal woman, you have felt or sensed this unspoken contract in every relationship even if you couldn't name it: the way her eyes lit up when you succeeded and dimmed when you failed. The way her 'love' seemed tied to your utility. Jung called this the 'maternal bargain', a woman's unconscious ability to assess a man's genetic, economic and social value and then adjust her loyalty accordingly. But here's the brutal part and where, if you are trapped in such a relationship as a believing man, you must show grace when you see through the lie: she doesn't even know she's doing it unless she has been instructed as I am hopefully succeeding in instructing you today in which case you no longer have any excuse...because with knowledge you're accountable.

Just as you don't consciously choose to be aroused by youth and fertility, the woman doesn't (according to Jung) choose to resent weakness. It's encoded or programmed into her flesh because of what Eve received when she ate that forbidden fruit from the Serpent in the Garden of Eden. It's Satan's own nature and it's in everyone born into mortality, and it will manifest in everyone unless you die to the flesh and invite Christ to live in you...for real. Once you have understood this, every confusing relationship break-up, every suddden loss of attraction, every 'I just don't feel the same anymore', will finally make sense.

Jung's controversial notes describe women as 'unconscious predators' not because they are evil but because, as unredeemed souls, their ability to survive as the physically 'weaker sex' depends on their ability to evaluate, extract and exit. It makes perfect, logical sense. And whilst modern culture calls this 'toxic', in the fallen natural realm of 'red tooth and claw' it's necessary. If as a carnal woman you have been married to, or are in a relationship with, a carnal man, you'll probably understand me. Jung would call it 'nature' but it's more specific than that - it's fallen nature. The carnal woman falls for the man's potential, then punishes him for not fulfilling it. She craves his strength, then tests it by creating chaos (like leaving him). She demands vulnerability, and then loses attraction the moment you show it because vulnerability equates with femaleness. This isn't hypocrisy necessarily, it's what some would call hypergamy - the drive to secure the best possible mate, even at the cost of emotional whiplash. But here's what no one unfortunately tells you: women hate this truth more than men do because the next layer - yes, there's more, I'm afraid - the one burried deepest in our psyche that Jung's discovered - exposes the one thing a woman fears more than being alone - she desperately fears BEING SEEN for who she really is.

There's a moment in every man's life when the princess illusion shatters. You see the script she's been following with clarity, the one she didn't even know she was holding in her hands. Jung called this the 'Shadow War', the invisible battle between who the woman pretends to be and what she actually is, the source of her inner confusion. And this is the alarming part: she's losing the fight too, and she knows it. Men, pause for a moment and think about the most manipulative woman you've ever known. Was she sitting there, twirling her moustache and making horrid cackling sounds as she plotted your downfall? No, of course not. The most dangerous women believe their own lies. When she says, 'I just want honesty' while punishing you for it. When she claims, 'I'm not angry' while making you suffer for it. That's not malice. That's instinct coming from a dark, satanic place. Jung found that women control men not through force, but through emotional alchemy, by turning your own virtues against you. If you're older, you've lived this. The more responsible you became, the more irresponsible she acted. The more emotional support you offered, the more crises she created. The harder you worked to make her happy, the more miserable she made you. And you found yourself pulling your hair out in desperation because nothing you tried worked. In the end she blamed you for her crisis and left.

Jung describes this as the 'Martyr's Trap'. A carnal woman's shadowy side needs chaos to feel alive. So if you're stable, she'll destabilise you. If you're confident, she'll test you...not because she wants to hurt you but because her unconscious carnal, machiavellian side demands proof you can survive her darkness. Here's the truth that will make your skin crawl: the sweeter the woman, the deadlier the shadow. Jung's clinical files overflow with perfect wives who secretly sabotaged their husbands - not with affairs or insults but with strategic helplessness. The migraine that always struck when he needed courage, the depression that mysteriously vanished when he stopped paying attention. These aren't conspiracies, they're unconscious carnal survival mechanisms that hearken all the way back to the Garden of Eden when Eve disrupted the harmony of her soul and the unity of her relationship with Adam as his wife by first believing the lies of the Serpent that Yahweh was holding back something good from her, and that she wouldn't die if she ate the forbidden fruit, persuading her that she should rebel against her husband's instruction not to partake of the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil without either Adam or Yahweh telling her why...other than it would kill her. Which it did...gradually.

We don't actually need the fruit of the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil which is where this dark, shadowy female side comes from, as also the shadowy male side. If you're partaking of the fruit of the Tree of Life you have all you need because we have to live by faith in the One who knows everything. We don't, and can't, know it all. So the biggest lie we need to overcome is that we need this deady fruit from the Tree of Gnosis or Knowledge so that we can 'know' the way Yahweh knows. The older you get, the more futile and stupid such a notion appears. Knowledge is wonderful but it's not the main thing...ever. I'm a scientist, I love to explore and increase my knowledge-base. I love astronomy and cosmology. But every time the James Webb telescope discovers something new, everything we thought we knew about the origin of the universe gets turned on its head and we have to start all over again in trying to understand how and where everything came from. Well, Elohim (God) has already told us, so why not just believe Him? It comes from Him. That's a lot simpler and its true. Similarly, husbands have a headship rôle that demands a wife's submission because he can see some pretty important things she can't. Eve was deceived, Adam wasn't. Adam knew what he was doing when he ate that fruit, making him the greater sinner...and more stubborn than women as a rule. It's why fewer men are saved. It's why women outnumber men in the Millennium by as much as seven-to-one (Is.4:1). And it's why Father has made provision for that gender imbalance which women hate and men reject because they're afraid of their women. There you have it in a nutshell.

So when a woman says, 'I don't know why I'm like this', believe her, she doesn't. But you do now. Her shadow, and the demons that steer it invisibly from her unconscious, know because they're pulling the strings so long as she operates out of the flesh. The good news is that this war isn't hopeless because Jung discovered something worse than the shadow - one of the two weapons to defeat it - the one for the man that I'm going to share with you now, and the one for the woman which all of you should already know from Scripture! And when husbands learn how to wield this weapon, they'll never fear the dark side of the female psyche again. With its mystery disarmed and the real puppeteers identified, women can now be set free and their husbands can act decisively and effectively. This final truth changes the battle ground completely.

I don't know know what comforting lies you men have believed about women but they are in reality no comfort at all. We mostly try to shrug it all off and hide behind humour. I'll give you an example. The YouTubers among you may have come across short one minute humerous quips by married couples showing how they deal with the so-called 'mysteries' of the sexes. I follow an American couple who are perfect illustrations of what I have been talking about. Usually one is talking into the camera asking questions and the other is in the background answering them. In one I saw a couple of days ago, the husband announces to his viewers that his wife has become a nun. She, of course, reacts in shock. 'No I haven't!' 'Yes, you have,' he responds and so the indignation and tension builds up. 'When?' she demands to know, confused and agitated. 'Yesterday, when you gave me none, the day before when you gave me none, this morning when you gave me none, and tomorrow when you'll give me none too.' Her jaw dropped in sudden realisation. You see, speaking of worldly relationships (not Christian), the carnal woman who wants to capture her man, gives the carnal man lots of sex to reel him in (his fault for being unchaste), and then when she's trapped him in marriage (her fault), gives it less frequently, making him negociate for it by doing various things for her and making him behaving in certain ways like her slave. It's very common and the butt of many jokes. But it isn't funny when you understand what's really going on.

I am hoping that the brutal truths I am sharing with you today will shock you into doing something about this carnal state of affairs. The good news is that husbands can and must do something about this if it applies to their situation and save both their wives and their marriages. There are two aspects this:

• 1. What the husband can, and must, immediately start doing until the wife understands and yields; and
• 2. What only Father Yahweh can do with the wife's cooperation, and that is save her from herself - from her dark side.

A warning: the solution will make men seem dangerous and unsafe to the women whilst the apparent 'danger' is in fact their liberation...but it is not cruel or bitter. Understand that the motive is redemption, not enslavement. The solution will make the husband seem dangerous in the sense that a lion is dangerous to wolves or a godly man to Satan and his demons. He will only be dangerous in the way that truth is dangerous to lies. So I will conclude by turning to Jung's solutions to the first point and then consider the second.

Knowledge is power. A man who understands that the carnal female nature cannot be controlled without understanding what's going on can gain the confidence he needs. The reverse is true of carnal men and spiritual women too. Here are the things that you, the husband, must do:

• 1. Become your wife's mirror. Women don't as a rule change if you simply lecture them - they change only if there are consequences. A woman's shadow only respects what it cannot manipulate. So:

  • a. When she creates chaos, become still;
  • b. When she plays victim, become indifferent; and
  • c. When she tests you, become unreachable.

  Do these things not as punishment but as spiritual physics. Just as light bends around a black hole, so female nature bends around unshakable male resolve;

• 2. Outsource nothing. Your grandfathers knew this truth instinctively. Never let a carnal woman be your therapist, your purpose or your moral compass. Why? because the moment you outsource your emotional oxygen to a carnal woman, she must suffocate you to survive. This is why modern men are slaves. This is why feminism still survives. Deceived and weak men beg for sex instead of commanding attraction. Deceived and weak men seek permission instead of imposing standards as heads. Deceived and weak men negociate desire instead of inspiring passion. What is the purpose in all of this? It is to develop in the male a soul-nature so rich and sufficient in Christ that female attention becomes optional and not something you crave; and finally,

• 3. Transform your own shadow. A man's power comes not from avoiding darkness but from overcoming his own and walking in the Light of Christ. That rage at being manipulated which you suppress, overcome and channel it into self-discipline: that passion you deny in yourself while your carnal wife tries to bargain sex with you, transform it into creative force. That fear of being alone, burn it into self-sufficiency in Yah'shua (Jesus). Women don't fear nice men. They fear integrated men, godly men whose shadows they have overcome in Christ and replaced with their Master. You, the man, have got to be the man you were designed to be by Yahweh before you can attract a godly woman and persuade her that obeying you and submitting to your demands won't result in her enslavement but actually bring her fulfilment and joy. Yahweh can channel or transform anything. So you men have to put your foot down, refuse to be manipulated, and then sort yourself out...if you didn't do that before you got married, which you should have done. But I get it...we all walk in a certain amount of ignorance and need to navigate inside of marriage as well as before. None of us are ever 100 per cent ready for marriage because we still have things to learn that may take us a lifetime.

Now Jung would have advised men to weaponise their shadow and use it against their wives' shadows, and overpower them that way, but that's a carnal solution. He was a not a regular Christian, not born again, but had some ideas right. You have to be careful with deliverance ministers, psychoanalysts, therapists and counsellors because their toolbox is invariably a mixed bag. I am wary of all of them having previously been heavily immersed in Freud, Breuer, Jung and Janov principally. There are risks involved so you need to know what you're dealing with. Jung's third method works...up to a point...but at the expense of depth in the relationship because only Christ can reach into those deeper areas where echad union takes place. A large part of my ministry has concerned itself with marriage matters and in preparing believers for the millennial world that is to come. Christendom has a lot to unlearn because the way marriage works in a sanctified state is very different from what you see all around you where couples fumble around, making treaties with the flesh, trying to make things work knowing very little about human nature, the way it is, and how to transform it.

So, men, whether married or still unmarried, you've got to start with yourself so that you are attractive to godly women for all the right reasons and then you must lead in the right way. It's unlikely that either of you will have it all figured out before marriage so there is always a certain amount of risk involved. Be prepared to take it. I certainly didn't have it all figured out, not by a long shot. I have had to learn the long, hard and painful way. Father has graciously taught me much and this I willingly share with you. I have felt an urgency bringing this to you today as I don't want to leave any loose ends before I am taken home. For centuries this kind of knowledge - at least some of it because much has had to await the very end times - was reserved for kings, warriors and the occasional rogue philosopher who knew how to deal with what one might call the 'soft tyrany' of women, the kind that doesn't command but subtly infects; the kind that has you begging for mercy and calling it 'love'. The dark side has taught women the art ruling without appearing to rule at all. Now the tools to expose this charade are yours and, I hope, you'll excercise them with grace in a proper Christian setting. The question isn't whether you'll use them, but how soon. Because the world needs dangerous men now more than ever - not cruel men, not violent men, but godly men who cannot be controlled or manipulated. That is the stuff of leadership, and every Remnant head of a household - whether husband or father - must do what needs to be done to fulfil the calling to lead. You've seen the truth. Now live it. May the grace of our Master Yah'shua the Messiah (Jesus Christ) be with you today, and always. Amen.

Endnotes

[1] Carl G. Jung, chapter 5, Aion: Researches into the Phenomenology of the Self (1951)
[2] This statement is often falsely attributed to Nietzsche or to the poet Heinrich Heine and has been completely twisted by both Black Metal and Norse mythology websites who pretend the quote has something to do with a giant occultic ash tree reaching to the pagan Viking 'Eden' called Yggdrasil. This is why you must be so careful when navigating the internet where falsehood easily mutates and spreads.

This page was created on 3 April 2025 Last updated on 22 April 2025

Copywrite © 1987-2025 NCAY - All Rights Reserved