New Covenant Ministries
"Pilgrimettes"
From
THE PILGRIM
WESTCOTT
&
HORT
Were
They
Members of
a
"GHOST
SOCIETY
?"
by
Dr.
ROBERT SUMNER
There is a
"KJV-Only" network of
publications that, by quoting each
other, are mass instigators of
misinformation,
each seeming to to feel its own publication is the last line of defense
before the capitulation of Fundamentalism to the Enemy. As an illustration
of what I am talking about, in the July/August 1993 issue of
Battle Cry [the publication of Californian
tract cartoonist and "KJV-Only" advocate
Jack Chick], there was an article
with a two-column heading, "Son of Biblical
Text Editor Westcott Says: 'My Father Was
a Spiritualist'." Here are the opening two paragraphs
Writing
that his father had a lifelong
"faith
in what for lack of a better
name, one must call
Spiritualism," the
son of famed biblical Greek text
editor B. F. Westcott admits to considerable
public alarm at his father's
activity. Westcott & his
famed partner, Hort, were among the
founders of the Ghost Society in
the 1850s. Fascinated by the spirit
world, their club was dedicated to
pursuing knowledge of ghostly encounters
with spirits.
Is this information true
or false? Well, let's just say it is a prime example of what these
fellows do with a tiny germ of truth, twisting it to give their readers a
false picture and make the victim look bad
in this case, 19th century men who have been dead a combined
total of 195 years
(Brook
Foss Westcott died
in 1901 and Fenton John Anthony
Hort in 1892), men no longer around to defend their honor.
To get at the TRUTH, note the
following
(1) The Guild was not formed
(Westcott's association was short lived, as we assume was Hort's) when the
two were mature biblicists seeking to restore the New Testament Greek text,
but when they were still students at the University of Cambridge.
(2) The author of the article above
erred in the name. It was not the "Ghost Society," but the "Ghostlie Guild."
In short, it seems to have been exactly the kind of humorous name a bunch
of college kids would give such a society. While an error in the name is
not of earth-shaking import, it does show the inattention to
detail of which these heresy hunters are often guilty.
(3) The Guild was not formed so
that its members could communicate with ghosts. Quite the contrary, it was
intended as a scientific society "established for the investigation of all
supernatural appearances and effects." Its members were to collect all such
accounts possible, investigate them, discard those obviously false, and seek
to document any that might be true. Members were instructed, in dealing with
alleged accounts, to "request written communications, with full details of
persons, times, and places," although the informers' names would not be used
"without special permission." Still, a guild member "making any communication
should be acquainted with the names, and knowledge or conviction." Even as
college kids, then, Westcott and Hort were not participating in "seances,"
playing with ouija boards, becoming involved in
"crystal-gazing," or sampling any other form of phenomenon
of the spirit world.
(4) One could not doubt the reality
of some of these apparitions and spectacles without denying the existence
of biblical demons. We refuse to do that.
(5) Perhaps the most blatant
misrepresentation in the entire Battle Cry
article was in the opening sentence of paragraph one (see above). Here is
what Arthur Westcott actually wrote about his father: "What happened to this
Guild in the end I have not discovered. My father ceased to interest himself
in these matters, not altogether, I believe, from want of faith in what,
for lack of a better name, one must call Spiritualism, but because he was
seriously convinced that such investigations led to no good."
Do you not see how the words
of the son were twisted by the writer of the unsigned article? He
said Westcott had a lifelong faith in Spiritualism. The son said his "father
ceased to interest himself in these matters." All the son was saying was
that his father never ceased to believe in the existence and ministry of
demons. Nor have we. The longer we live the more we are convinced of
their reality. (And we hope no future heresy hunter will write an article
after my decease calling me a Spiritualist. I am not! Nor is there evidence
that either Westcott or Hort were!)
Why, pray tell, did the
anonymous writer omit the phrase that would have ruined his expose':
"[Westcott]
was seriously convinced that such investigations led to
no
good."
Yes, why ?
We don't mind writers exposing
error. What we object to is distorting, slanting, twisting information so
that it presents a false picture in order to make the "Enemy" look bad. Go
ahead, fight the "W-H
Text" if you think it is bad. Show how it is bad.
Fight the translations made from it, calling attention to their errors. We
have no objection. But do it honestly, fairly, and in a Christian
spirit of love. In other words, if you are going to fight, fight like a
man!
And when you discover
you've erred, correct
it. (We wonder how many in the "good ol' boy" network who published the
Chick
error, after reading this, will make a correction in their paper?
Don't hold your breath!)
written by Dr. Robert Sumner in
Sumner's Incidents and Illustrations
column
(published in the January, 1994 issue of
TARGET
Magazine, Garland
TX)
This Page was Created on 27 November 1998