New Covenant Ministries
"Pilgrimettes"
From
THE PILGRIM

"NOT ONE JOTE
OR ONE
TITLE..."
A Plea for
"Original
KJV"
Spelling
by
Sir JOHN BOOKMAN
[a devout
"KJV-Only
Bible
Believer"]
Just days ago, I realized we
have not gone far enough in insisting that the Bible be preserved
unchanged "in the form God intended for us to have."
Of course, I speak of the infallible, inerrant,
verbally-inspired
and unalterably preserved English Bible, the
Authorized Version (AV
1611), "the
only Bible God
uses and Satan
hates!"
Sure, there are lots of zealous defenders
who have shielded the KJV from the corruptions of such
heinous "translations" as the NIV,
the NASB, and that most sinister
NKJV, and have kept us from returning to the now completely
unnecessary, "original"
Hebrew and
Greek. But while they kept their
watch on one front, the Enemy has come in unawares by another route
and sown seeds of corruption that have, I fear, already yielded a corrupt
harvest.
What am
I getting at ? Simply this
we have insisted on the
verbal inspiration of the
English, that is, that the very English words
were divinely chosen and given to
the Learned Men
[KJV
Translators]. But simply insisting on the perfecting
of the English words and preserving the words is
not enough. A careful consideration
of the true intent and meaning of the words
of Matthew 5:18 is necessary
"Till heuven and earth
passe, one iote or one title, shall
in no wise passe from the law,
till all be fulfilled."
[I have made
no mistake in my
spelling, as I shall shortly
explain.]
Notice how Jesus insisted on the
verbal inspiration, not just of the words, but also of the very letters of
the words of Scripture. And since this verse is a specific promise of the
preservation of Scripture in our
infallible English Bible, we must insist on following, not just the
original KJV words but also their very
spelling. What other meaning
can we draw out of the words "one iote or one title?"
Every letter
the very spelling is certainly
inspired, and to alter the spelling of a single word, to alter even a single
letter in a single word, is to deny and reject the
inspiration of the AV 1611. If
God had wanted us to spell the
words in
the AV 1611 differently in today's revised KJV, He would have
given them to us in that form
originally!
Modern spelling is as hideous and hateful
a thing as modern translations. It's New Age
corruption, pure and simple. No one was ever
authorized to corrupt, to "modernize"
the infallible original
spelling.
There are
eight spelling
corruptions in John 3:16
alone!!
I'm sure some "liberal" apostate
will say, "What difference does spelling
make?" Argue it out with Jesus brother! Didn't He say
that inspiration of the words included the very spelling, every iote, not
just the words? Will you reject the teaching of Matthew
5:18 of letter/spelling inspiration of our
preserved AV 1611? To stop at
"word inspiration" and not insist
on spelling inspiration is to be
second cousin to mere "thought inspiration." It is creeping
apostasy, through and through. Next someone
will deny the inspiration of the
chapter-and-verse numberings in the AV 1611.
Where will it stop?
And I think we must recognize that
Jesus' infallible English word was
"title" and not the
now-corrupted
"tittle."
A tittle is part of the ornamentation of a Hebrew letter [at least
that's what I've heard at Fellowship meetings, so I have assurance that it's
right]. But a "title" is something else. I have complete
confidence that this promise of Jesus was a specific
reference to the preservation of the chapter and
page headings, the titles found in the original AV 1611.
Sadly, those infallible titles, attached by the
Learned Men under divine inspiration at
the top of each page and at the beginning of each chapter have been removed
from our modern editions. Without them, we cannot claim that we have a
perfectly preserved
Bible, and by allowing
them to be removed, we have called God a liar, and denied that He is able
to preserve the inspired English Bible He has given us.
It is not secret that
none of the commonly used English
Bibles published in our day have the
original AV 1611 spelling, or
punctuation (that, too, is part of our directly inspired, infallible English
Bible) or titles of which Jesus spoke, so in reality, these Bibles, even
though they say "King James Version" or "Authorized Version" are really not
Bibles at all. Only the recent Thomas Nelson
Publishers reprint of the
original 1611 AV is a
real Bible; all the
other KJV's are
sinister corruptions.
And there is growing
upon me the deep
conviction, as
deep as anything I've
written in this article, that
no
English-speaking person can be saved
if he was not saved
by an
original, unaltered AV
1611, with
original
spelling,
original
punctuation, and
original
chapter and page titles. This simply means that
anyone who thought he was "saved" by reading a
Revised "KJV"
[Oxford, Cambridge, old Scofield,
etc.], or by hearing a sermon from such a "Bible," or by
reading a Gospel tract that quoted the words in a revised spelling form,
even if it was labelled "KJV," is not really
saved, has never been saved, and never will be saved until he
gets a true,
fully-preserved AV
1611.
That means that virtually all those
who thought they were
saved preachers,
deacons and all will have to go back and
get truly
saved through a
real AV 1611, then get rebaptized.
Verbal inspiration of the English requires
inspiration
of the very spelling as well. Anything less is
rank modernism.
I will confess to one further worry
original
type-style.
The real AV 1611 was printed in what printers
call "black letter," a very ornate type-style much like
Gothic script, which is still used many times for the banner at the
top of newspapers. This original type-style was
subtly replaced with
Roman type sometime in the 18th century.
Note that name
Roman. I
fear that once again, the Jesuits have conspired
to corrupt the
pure word in English. They have taken away
the original Gothic [and as everyone knows, the Gothic Bible used
the Textus Receptus for its foundation which proves
with certainty that the Gothic was the correct script for a real
Bible], and have substituted the
corrupt Roman
script.
In a real sense, even the KJV has
thus become a "Roman" Bible, since its modern editions use Roman script and
not the original black letter. As further proof that Roman type is a corruption,
notice that all these apostate Bibles the
ERV, ASV, NASB, NIV, NKJV, and the rest,
have always been printed in Roman type. That's
proof enough to me that any Bible in Roman
type is no "Bible" at all, and that
only a Bible with the
original script, the black letter
given to us in the form we should have it by the
Learned Men,
is a true Bible.
Perhaps even those "saved" by the
true original spelling KJV are not saved at all, and must locate a
black-letter edition. The Roman script
Thomas Nelson reprint
may not be enough [it's just like those
Bible corrupters at Thomas Nelson to pass off a
"Roman script KJV" as though it were a real
Bible!].
Fortunately for me, my brother has
a facsimile in the original black-letter of the AV 1611, and
I'm secure since I've studied out of it several
times.
It is a
desperate situation! The shortage
of
black-letter,
original-spelling
AV 1611 Bibles is severe! There is truly a famine of
the truly preserved word of God in the land. And
all our efforts at preaching, teaching, Bible study, and soul winning are
completely futile until we return to
the real, unaltered, perfectly preserved
bonafied
AV 1611! Perhaps
the best thing to do for the present is to send off and buy one of those
pages from an "original
KJV," and if you can get a page that has a salvation
verse, or part of the "Romans
road," perhaps there will be enough
of the Gospel in the true preserved
English to rescue your soul.
As a service to you readers, so that
you can be saved through a real AV 1611,
I quote John 3:16 below
unfortunately, I have no capacity to reproduce the
original
black-letter script, so even believing the
un-revised spelling may not be enough, but we can hope
for the best
"For God so loued ye
world,
that he gaue
his only begotten Sonne: that whosoeur
beleeueth in
him, should not perish, but haue
euerlasting
life."
THIS ARTICLE IS
SATIRE
A KJV-ONLY VIEW
written by Doug Kutilek former
co-editor of
Baptist Biblical
Heritage
published in THE
PILGRIM
Magazine
(Issue #19, Vol 6, No. 1, Summer 1995)
This Page was Created on 27 November 1998