General audience

1.
Critique of 'Bible study proves Christopher C. Warren
is a False Prophet'

[Heh... that’s kind of wishful thinking on nccg_concern’s side. Derek Rumpler contributed here to refute this and the “Analytic” links on the right, as I am no theology genius (but in contrast with nccg_concern, I don’t pretend I am one). However, I collected a few statements which sounded so absurd and odd that I couldn’t help but to write something about them. They are to be found in this link.]

Analytic


1
Critique of 'An analysis of  "event-styled" Prophecy
and its application to False Prophecy concepts'
(not NCCG specific)



2.
Critique of 'Olive Branch and other NCCG prophecies
observed to have no prophetic value
(and Christopher C. Warren is a
False Prophet)'
#1 article above is a prerequisite for article #2

Theological Help

[Just like I said, better not pretend to know what you half-know or it just ends up in mess and nonsense.]

One of the reasons some people come to NCCG is because they want to understand exactly what the Bible means for them to do and what doctrine it teaches. They feel that it would be best to eliminate as many errors due to mistranslations and misunderstandings as possible, using the oldest available Bible texts in that effort, and come to understand what the Bible means from that perspective. www.nccg.org was there for them, and at that time, it fulfilled what they thought was a means to help. [And that’s how it is. What is not mentioned here is something which derives directly from common sense: WHO is NCCG? Its members. Similar as a political party, a football team, any group that has a leader. The “body” of NCCG are its members. And WHO are these people? They are people who are very much interested in understanding the Bible as accurately as possible. Now, how on earth come so many people who are Bible-crazy stick around an alleged “false prophet” is beyond me. I venture to say that these people know their Bibles FAR better than nccg_concern. Are they ALL blind?! Are they ALL idiots? OR, maybe, just maybe, nccg_concern has it all wrong?]

Christopher Warren is not the only person to have engaged in such an effort, however. In fact, others have done the same thing, and some of them have come to very different conclusions than he has about doctrine. [Well, no wonder. That’s why there are so many different denominations, hundreds of them. Just because someone disagrees, does this mean they’re right? Isn’t that a hint of some inferiority complex? What is nccg_concern going to do when he reads this website? I did what he did and have come to very different conclusions than him. I guess I’m right then, and he’s wrong, so let’s just stone him or bury him alive? How would he like that?]

The fruits of Holy Spirit are love, joy, peace, longsuffering, gentleness, goodness, faith, meekness, and temperance. This are traits that people who are truly in contact with the Holy Spirit will demonstrate. Does this (http://www.geocities.com/nccg_concern/ass-3.html) look like the fruits of the Holy Spirit to you? or this (http://www.geocities.com/nccg_concern/ass-4.html)? or this (http://www.geocities.com/nccg_concern/false.html)? or this (http://www.geocities.com/nccg_concern/current.html)? [OK, since he brings up theology to prove a point someone, I’m going to do the same, I think it’s legitimate: Jesus said not to judge (Matt 7:1-2, Luke 6:37), He said actually, that even HE doesn’t judge those who believe in Him (John 3:17)! He also said NOT to spot the speck in your neighbours eye while there is a beam in our own eye and that if you do that, you’re a downright hypocrite in His eyes (Matt 7:3-5). Nccg_concern is inviting you to judge here. In that sense, he is urging you to sin and accusing someone, so he is imitating the characteristics of Satan. Does he really believe that he is without sin so he might as well cast the first stone? (John 8:7)]

Other people who have also examined the oldest Bible texts (and who also demonstrate better fruits) [Under what authority is this verdict?] have come to conclusions about doctrine which do not involve anyone cutting off friends or family [nevermind that no NCCG member was ever asked to do that, but are encouraged to do the opposite actually], or strict Saturday Sabbath observance (and the resulting alienation from your family and friends this causes) [nevermind that millions of people do the same – and the alleged alienation is in this place mere speculation; the author is in no position to know], or adopting someone new as any sort of father or mother [only 2 members have done so], or the influencing of women across the world to move in with their internet spiritual teacher to become one of his (polygamic) wives. [… but other people who don’t believe in the Bible are allowed to screw around all they want. Smart.]

A list of some other people who have come to different doctrinal conclusions than Christopher Warren, while utilizing the methods he claims to use, is shown at the bottom of this page. Others will be added as they are encountered. It's a big world out there, and it does not end at the doorstep of Hillringsberg Skolen 3. [Maybe nccg_concern should tell that to himself? The NCCG members are surely allowed to be as obsessed as they wish because they do not build websites to throw mud at those who disagree, nor do they try to shove their opinions down people’s throats, nor do they actively hate the ones they don’t approve of. No, THEIR life ends at their God. Where does nccg_concern’s life end? At the rebuttal of his comments by C.C. Warren in his message board? At the length of time his e-mails are replied to? At how much “source material” he can accumulate so he can safely throw more and smellier mud at people?]