- The author of this website
has posted his “character assassinations” for the whole world to see. This
material is in its most part direct accusations or subtle attempts to
“bring down” the church of NCCG, or at least give the wrong impression and
destroy its reputation. The name of the author, what he believes in or why
he has done this work is nowhere mentioned. Also, the author of this
website has repeatedly quoted material which he has obtained from a
private MSN Group
- C.C. Warren has posted his
own “character assassinations” exclusively for his “fringe and core
members” to see. This material is in its most part attempts to defend
himself and his work and to “bring down” the integrity of the people who
accuse him. His name, beliefs and reasons are mentioned in nearly every
post characterised as a “character assassination”. The material he has
quoted is available for the whole internet to see and use.
- In Rick Ross’s case, the
“vitriolic” material C.C. Warren used was not even his own writing, but was
obtained from public websites, which I am sure, Rick Ross himself would be
aware of already.
- In nccg_concern’s instance, this
author is a member of the NCCG Cyber group by his own testimony: nothing is
hidden from him by definition.
- In Gustav Sjöholm’s
case, this includes a letter to Sjöholm himself and a letter C.C.
Warren sent to the newspaper which would obviously come to Sjöholm’s
knowledge.
- Finally, indeed, bluewater2
could not have access to the material which was written about him.
Bluewater2 (falsely, and I guess by accident) claimed to have written the
material on this website and C.C. Warren immediately dug up everything he
could, as finding out who this author is had developed to somewhat of a
witch-hunt in the NCCG Groups. However, this was made clear, that
bluewater2 is not nccg_concern. C.C. Warren apologised to the group and to
bluewater2. This practically annuls all that was written against
bluewater2 and the joke, eventually, is on the “cult leader”.
- The “character assassination”
of Rick Ross is old news (the man has been dragged to court for his
actions), and something he would expect. The writings of C.C. Warren about
“cult deprogrammers” added very little more mud to the amount that Rick
Ross has already been covered with, which is quite a lot.
- The “character assassination”
of nccg_concern is something he should have obviously have expected also,
given his behaviour and biased criticism. No names were named in his case,
however. If his mother or wife or children (if he has a family) would ever
join NCCG Cyber Community, they would have by no means guessed that whom
everyone there calls “Mr. Concern” is their son, husband or father.
- The “character assassination”
of Gustav Sjöholm would probably increase his reputation (as happens
often in journalism). He, also, should expect it, and judging from his
choice of profession, he is probably used to it too.
- The “character assassination”
of bluewater2 was clearly a mistake and apologised for.
- The “character assassination”
of C.C. Warren was not provoked by his behaviour or biased criticism
against someone else. He had little reason to expect it as he has placed
disclaimers on all of his public websites making clear that the material
they are about to read might make certain groups of people feel insulted
and victims of “hate crimes”, and these people are encouraged to leave. No
disclaimer of this kind exists on this nccg_concern website (as there
should). He supports everything he says based on his own belief system,
which might be right or wrong, but he is entitled to it and has made it
crystal clear more than once.
CHARACTER
ASSASSINATION x 40
[As always, the author’s writings are in black and
mine in green. The font emphasis on this page is mine.]
Critique of
Written
attacks against enemies by
NCCG's leader, Christopher C. Warren
[When I read this page, I got tired of reading the phrase “character
assassination” over and over. I decided to count the times it appears. In this
one small page, this phrase features 13 times, and actually, another 27 (!)
times in the comments of the included articles. The page itself is titled “ass”…
I am not sure what the author implies. I will assume it is short for
“assassination” and move on.
Here we have a part of the website, number 5 on the list, titled written
attacks, while it should have obviously been given the commanding title “character
assassination”. The (ab)use of the phrase 40 times in total is to me
impressive. For some reason, the synonyms (defamation, libel, slander,
vilification etc) didn’t occur to the writer as an alternative. Why? Poor
vocabulary? Lack of a stronger term? Simply in love with the phrase? I don’t
know. Yet, I decided to look it up in a dictionary so it’s made clear what
we’re talking about:
character assassination (n.): A vicious personal verbal attack,
especially one intended to destroy or damage a public figure's reputation. (The
American Heritage Dictionaries).
I read the phrase once, I read it twice, I read it three times and it
dawned on me… What exactly is the author of this website doing?]
NCCG's
leader, Christopher C. Warren, has demonstrated a trend of character assassinating individuals (and in one case, a
classification of individuals) whom he perceives as being his enemies. The character assassinations have
frequently occurred at times when it was believed that Warren was angry at the
person. If the subject of earlier character
assassinations made him angry on a repeating or ongoing basis, multiple
character assassinations were
made.
[Now I am copying and pasting from other pages of this website.
Remember… “a vicious personal verbal attack…”
-
This web site author
has observed Christopher C. Warren to apparently be a skilled, creative
manipulator of facts and situations. This is to effect undue influence and,
ultimately, control over NCCG members.
-
Christopher Warren has
been noted to affirm several very dangerous perspectives to deeply-involved and
core NCCG members
-
The young children
currently living at the compound were not noted to have legal fathers listed in
the public record. However, it is known among core NCCG members that the father
is Christopher C. Warren.
-
(…) individuals with
areas of psychological vulnerability, family instability, or a history of
mental illness (…) are more likely to lead to a dependent and controlling
relationship with NCCG leadership.
-
One of the precepts
developed within NCCG members who are being groomed for core membership is that
of psychologically abandoning their biological family and non-group friends.
-
A trend has been noted
for NCCG to recruit women in an effort to have them move to the compound to
become additional wives for NCCG's leader. (…) There are indications that the
"marriages" within this group will result in planned pregnancies.
-
A unmarried female in
the 18 - 25 age bracket is, as observed statistically within NCCG, the most
vulnerable demographic for the highest level of core recruitment. This is the
demographic for some women who are being psychologically manipulated and
controlled through internet chat with NCCG's leadership, and are being groomed
to move to the NCCG compound.
That was derived from the Fast-Facts page. Now onto the Debunk page.
Also remember, “… intended to destroy or damage a public figure's reputation”.
-
Use of inducement of
Multiple Personality Disorder, primarily with women, to aid in developing a
controlling, guru-like relationship.
-
Chris Warren's comments
to the right are ABSOLUTE BULLSHIT!!!
-
I have never had a
issue with identifying myself to legitimate authorities (just not to paranoid,
delusional, potentially dangerous cult leaders, kthxbye).
-
In my observation, he
takes something that is just BAD, or CRAP, or CULTIC, or YOU NAME IT, and
tosses something that sounds nice afterwards or maybe even ALL AROUND IT , and
hopes that you will just suck it all down just like you are a goldfish.
And these are only a quick collection from 2 articles.
Maybe C.C. Warren’s writings could indeed classify as character
assassination, but, to quote the well known Bible phrase here, the one without
sin should cast the first stone. This is about being just and fair. 40 (!)
times is C.C. Warren attacked with the characterisation “character assassin”.
And yet, all over this website, repeatedly, this author claims the same title
for himself.]
None of these character
assassinations have been noted to be preceded by serious research.
Access to information about the individuals is not actually required. Where
information had been used within the character
assassination, the information has consisted of copied-and-pasted
defamatory material written by others about the individual as found on the
internet, or references to message board posts written by the person.
[Has nccg_concern gone into serious
research before defaming NCCG’s leader? There is no evidence anywhere. There is
nothing solid and most of it can be easily disproved by a week’s worth of
objective observation in the NCCG groups. It’s unlikely he spent a lot of time
in serious research. Has nccg_concern NOT copied and pasted material from
message boards written by C.C. Warren? Well, he has.]
There is
some evidence that in the past, Warren has done character assassinations on people other than the ones I
observed and documented here. It's possible that this tendency to character assassinate perceived
enemies has been a long-term trend since before I started my research.
The character assassinations were
released in locations which were, in the majority of cases, not accessible to
the person being attacked, being prominently displayed on an invite-only web
site that was visible to internet-located NCCG members. On one occasion, the character assassination was part
of an official complaint to a Swedish official (but was also included in the
internet area mentioned above).
[That is an interesting statement. Let’s look at what the two parties
are doing:
So, sadly, no, the “character assassinations” were not always directly accessible
for to the person to look at. Everyone knows there are very easy ways to build
a public website and C.C. Warren did not do this. Was it because he wanted to
privately “character assassinate” them? Is a character assassination worse when
it’s published or when it remains hidden?
Assuming these were indeed “character assassinations”, they were only
for the eyes of the NCCG members, which are about 410 people. However, the
“character assassinations” the author of this website was committed are made
public. In the end, everyone mentioned here is “character assassinated” What
are the implications of this for the parties?
The “character assassination” of C.C. Warren by the author of the
nccg_concern website has implications on many other people too. The immediate
“victims” of this are his family and the families that live with him. These
people see their father/spiritual leader being torn to pieces by a stranger
without a valid cause. The people who depend on C.C. Warren for their spiritual
guidance and possible deliverance (things which are well within the brackets of
mainstream Christianity and should not be scorned or taken lightly because to
those who believe in that, these things are life-and-death matters) see their
spiritual “head” being defamed and all his integrity spat at. Whether or not
C.C. Warren is 100% trustworthy I am not aware of, but the evidence I have of
him show that he is trustworthy to a great extend. This evidence is available
for every internet user interested and is provided freely by the NCCG websites
and NCCG groups.
Now, imagine if the attempt the nccg_concern author to bring down and
destroy (character assassinate, for lack of a better term…) this man’s work and
reputation actually SUCCEEDS. Imagine if some of the people who trust/count
on/love – you name it – C.C. Warren read this website and watch their
husband/father/“spiritual father”/friend being accused of manipulation,
downright schizophrenia, illusions and collecting young women for his supposed
polygamous family to have children with… The author of the nccg_concern website
might as well wish nothing more than to destroy C.C. Warren’s life (he remains
anonymous, and will probably never show his face, and he has not given the
public any idea of his intentions). What if he succeeds?
What follows are examples or at least anything the nccg_concern author
could find that supports his idea of character assassinations. I suggest you
read what C.C. Warren has to say for himself and compare the heaviness of the
accusations aimed at this author with the heaviness of the accusations made to
C.C. Warren’s person. I will not comment on C.C. Warren’s writings, as this is
beyond the purpose of this work, but I shall instead leave them to your own
judgement.]
|
Subject
(links to details) |
Brief
summary |
|
Rick Ross is an experienced exit counselor and runs
a prominent cult education web site. Pre-existing Scientology-authored character assassinations are
heavily utilized in this character
assassination. [Only 3 of the
articles included in this link are C.C. Warren’s own writings. Some are
written from another member of the group, whose name is removed. Why they are
attributed to C.C. Warren, or even mentioned at all, I do not know.] |
|
|
Finally, remember,
the term “character assassination” refers ESPECIALLY to damaging a PUBLIC
FIGURE’S reputation. Public figures have a name and a face. Nccg_concern has
neither so far, by his own choice. Rick Ross and C.C. Warren have both.] |
|
|
|
[This is up to the reader to decide, and they are quite capable of doing so without a pre-cooked judgement being imposed on them. In my opinion, the inaccuracies and misinterpretations are on nccg_concern's side.]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
