Grief on a Beach

    Click here to read my agenda for creating this website and my disclaimer

    [The purpose of this one puzzled me. This is a reproduction of a newspaper article in the NCCG Cyber Community board. C.C. Warren didn't even write it. This is what nccg_concern says:]

    Christopher C. Warren is known to locate articles on the internet which support his world point of view and duplicate them within his message boards. [Duplicate? He hasn't commented on it, he just posted it in a "World News" board.]

    He appears to have done this in regard to the ongoing Israel-Palestinian conflict.  The article effectively blames the Palestinians for an incident in which Palestinian civilians were killed. The complete post is shown below.

    [I fail to understand how C.C. Warren turns out to be a terrible person who duplicates facts when he posts an article about Palestinian human shields. I also fail to understand how nccg_concern's mind works sometimes. Is he implying that C.C. Warren has picked sides about the ongoing war and he carefully selects articles to back up his opinion? But then, there are MANY articles that criticise the Israeli/Jewisg mentaliy. If nccg_concern looked carefully, he would see that there have been posted articles which back up both sides, so implying that C.C. Warren subtly pushes his agenda through "locating articles on the internet" is actually misplaced judgement.

    If it's the journalist's opinion that bothers nccg_concern, he should go after the journalist, not the one who mirrors his article. This reminds me of when Muslim people started burning the Danish and Norwegian embassies in their countries for sketches of their Prophet that was published by a Danish newspaper. Nccg_concern seems to be of the same mentality when he attacks Warren for something another man wrote, and if he gets offended by a journalist's article that seems to show preference to Israel, maybe he's a Muslim too. It's much more probable though that he's just trying to pick on everything he can to make Warren look bad, so maybe he's just immature.

    Anyhow, I can think off the top of my head of at least 10 other webmasters who go about the internet fishing for articles that support their world point of view. Nccg_concern is one of them, if you will look at current, for instance, and he hasn't even done a thorough research. I'm one of them also. Instead of writing an article about SRA, I created a page full of links to show it exists, and I did the same thing about the abusive and non-professional deprogrammers.

    Given the number of factual and other mistakes in this source material release section, I'm beginning to lose what little esteem I had for nccg_concern's intellectual abilities.]

    World News : Who is to blame for grief on a beach?
    Choose another message board

     

    Prev Discussion  Next Discussion  Send Replies to My Inbox 

    Reply

    Recommend

     Message 1 of 1 in Discussion 

    From: MSN NicknameCommunity_Moderator  (Original Message)

    Sent: 6/23/2006 9:53 PM

     

    Death

    By Charles Krauthammer

     

    Who is to blame for grief on a beach?

    It was another one of those pictures that goes instantly around the world. A young Palestinian, wailing in wretched sorrow, grieving over her dead father, stepmother and five siblings who had been killed by an explosion on a Gaza beach. Then came the blame. Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas (he's the moderate) immediately called the killings an act of Israeli "genocide" and, to dramatize the crime, legally adopted the bereaved girl.

    The sensational coverage and sensational charges raise the obvious question: Why would Israel deliberately shell a peaceful family on a beach?

    The Israeli government, clumsy as ever, seemed to semi-apologize by expressing regret about the deaths, implying that perhaps they had been caused by an errant Israeli shell targeting a Palestinian rocket base. But then, a few days later, an army investigation concluded that it was not Israel's doing at all.

    First, because the shrapnel taken from the victims (treated at Israeli hospitals -- some "genocide") were not the ordnance used in Israeli artillery. Second, because aerial photography revealed no crater that could have been caused by Israeli artillery. And, third, because Israel could account for five of the six shells it launched at the rocket base nearby, and the missing one had been launched at least five minutes before the one that killed the family.

    An expert at a local chapter of a human rights group disputes the Israeli claims. Okay. Let's concede for the sake of argument that the question of whether it was an errant Israeli shell remains unresolved. But the obvious question not being asked is this: Who is to blame if Palestinians are setting up rocket launchers to attack Israel -- and placing them 400 yards from a beach crowded with Palestinian families on the Muslim Sabbath?

    Answer: This is another example of the Palestinians' classic and cowardly human-shield tactic -- attacking innocent Israeli civilians while hiding behind innocent Palestinian civilians. For Palestinian terrorists -- and the Palestinian governments (both Fatah and Hamas) that allow them to operate unmolested -- it's a win-win: If their rockets aimed into Israeli towns kill innocent Jews, no one abroad notices and it's another success in the terrorist war against Israel. And if Israel's preventive and deterrent attacks on those rocket bases inadvertently kill Palestinian civilians, the iconic "Israeli massacre" picture makes the front page of the New York Times, and the Palestinians win the propaganda war.

    But there is an even larger question not asked. Whether the rocket bases are near civilian beaches or in remote areas, why are the Gazans launching any rockets at Israel in the first place -- about 1,000 in the past year?

    To get Israel to remove its settlers, end the occupation and let the Palestinians achieve dignity and independence? But Israel did exactly that in Gaza last year. It completely evacuated Gaza, dismantled all its military installations, removed its soldiers, destroyed all Israeli settlements and expelled all 7,000 Israeli settlers. Israel then declared the line that separates Israel from Gaza to be an international frontier. Gaza became the first independent Palestinian territory ever.

    And what have the Palestinians done with this independence, this judenrein territory under the Palestinians' control? They have used their freedom to launch rockets at civilians in nearby Israeli towns.

    Why? Because the Palestinians prefer victimhood to statehood. They have demonstrated that for 60 years, beginning with their rejection of the United Nations decision to establish a Palestinian state in 1947 because it would have also created a small Jewish state next door. They declared war instead.

    Half a century later, at the Camp David summit with President Bill Clinton, Israel renewed the offer of a Palestinian state -- with its capital in Jerusalem, with not a single Jewish settler remaining in Palestine, and on a contiguous territory encompassing 95 percent of the West Bank (Israel making up the other 5 percent with pieces of Israel proper).

    The Palestinian answer? War again -- Yasser Arafat's terror war, aka the second intifada, which killed a thousand Jews.

    This embrace of victimhood, of martyrdom, of blood and suffering, is the Palestinian disease. They are offered an independent state. They are given all of Gaza. And they respond with rocket attacks into peaceful Israeli towns -- in pre-1967 Israel proper, mind you.

    What can Israel do but try to take out those rocket bases and their crews? What would the United States do if rockets were raining into San Diego from across the border with Mexico?

    Now look again at that terrible photograph and ask yourself: Who is responsible for the heart-rending grief of that poor Palestinian girl?

    This article originally appeared in the Washington Post.

    http://www.aish.com/jewishissues/middleeast/Death_in_Gaza.asp



    Back

    All material not in black type face is copyright © 2006 Axroot